Considering this video was posted by somebody to prove there were explosives at the World Trade Center on September 11,2001. I concur of his idea, but people tend to change their version after a long period of time.

On 9/11/01 there was a lot of confusion and panic.

Many witnesses including firefighters heard of what they said to them sounded like explosives or controlled detonators going off just before Tower 2, South Tower, began to collapse at 9:59 a.m.

They thought they heard bombs.

Many videographers filming the events that very morning captured Tower 2 and Tower 1. Some began to run out with other surviviors out of Vesey St, Church St, West St and surrounding locations of the WTC Plaza in the meantime watching Tower 2 already begining to collapse.

During that same moment when we see the tower starting to collapse, you can hear sounds of "gunfire" as though somebody is shooting a handcannon.

Likely those sounds were from resistance of each floor of the skyscraper pounding downwards as each second passes by.

The sounds are of this:  Pow Pow.....Pow-Pow-Pow-Pow-Pow

First a single loud pop, then following each 1/18 or so of a second in a rapid sound like automatic gunfire.

By the way each Tower was 110 stories high.

It is not exact how many seconds the tower began to tumble until it finally hit ground level.

It looked to me like 10 seconds flat.  Some other people said 13.

That is a 3 second difference. Every split second counts.

Either way, each tower came down pretty fast.

Tower 1, North Tower, the skyscraper that was first hit at 8:46 a.m., endured only 102 minutes of impact not entirely in a severe damage, finally came crashing down at 10:28 a.m.

[Amoungst the fatalities of either towers was 343 FDNY firefighters. One was  firefighter Lt. Kevin Pfiefer, commander of Engine 33, and was the brother to FDNY Battalion Chief Joseph Pfiefer, Ladder 7, Battalion 1. Kevin Pfiefer was killed while he and another firefighter was attempting to exit out of the North Tower. Joseph was one of the first firefighters who arrived at Tower 1 when it was hit early that morning. He was one of the witnesses who saw an airliner hit Tower 1 while he was investigating an alleged gas leak 13 blocks away from the World Trade Center. He and his company of Ladder 7 heard a airplane flying low over lower Manhattan when it all began at 8:46. This was captured on film by Jules Naudet. See the Naudet 9/11 documentary.]

 
Explosions were heard heard two blocks northwest of the World Trade Center. This would be at Chambers St located near the waterfront of the Hudson River. Continous reports of similiar noises of what appeared to be "explosives" just beyond south of the WTC plaza at Liberty St. & Trinity St.

Given this information, it does sound more than appearant there was explosions going off in and around the WTC complex. There must of been bombs planted at nearly each building in that vicinity.

But WTC bldgs 4,5,&6 were damaged caused by fire spread by the collapse of both WTC 1 and WTC 2.

Across West Vesey St from the plaza is WTC 7.  This tower stood at 47 stories high. It was used for a bomb shelter and a command post also as a CIA headquarters. WTC 7 collapsed in late afternoon on 9/11/01. The official version was that it suffered structural damage from intense heat given by Tower 1(WTC 1).

A t 5: 27 p.m., WTC 7 collapsed in a vertical motion.

This effect caused theorists in believing WTC 7  was sabatoged with remote detonation that was placed on each of the bottom support frames which is known as a "vertical motion" collapse---coming straight down.

Rectangular windows were "blown out" when WTC 7 began to collapse vertically.

WTC 1 aka North Tower-Tower 1 collapsed in almost in similiarity.

At 10:28 a.m. when WTC 1 debris from the top sections were "blown out" just when it began to collapse.

Before it came down, firefighters were very concerned of WTC 7, they said it would come down. And that did happen.

The adjacent buildings, The Verizon and the U.S. Postal Office, both survived with minimal damage. And these two buildings were the same distance away from the Towers.

Survived minimal damage.

As Tower 1 began to fall, heavy debris propelled outwards. Shattered material seen in this photo hits WTC 7.

Debris was eject as far as several city blocks in lower Manhattan.


The Verizon and the U.S. Postal Office being closest to WTC 7. The Verizon stands closer to WTC 1 then WTC 7. Why did not the Verizon or the Postal Office suffer from extensive damage as WTC 7?  


















"It looked as though the plane hit the lobby" -Joe Casaliggi, Engine 7, Battalion 1.
 

One of the first repsonders to arrive at the World Trade Center was Engine 7. When they entered the lobby, they could see the windows in the lobby blasted out. They also had observed the marble tiles on the walls cracked. 

This made the author of this blog to believe there were explosives under the basement-the parking garage-that send a heavy concussion in the lobby where it blew out the windows.  

It is 2009, and I would like to hear a follow-up what the firefighters have to say now after 8 full years since 9/11/01.  Are they still going to reiterate of what they said then was explosions?  Will these witnesses have a change of opinion of what they might of heard back in 2001?


I wrote a few months ago regarding possible gas leaks on 9/11. There are gas lines that run under the World Trade Center, not directly into the buidings. These explosions that you heard in the video had to be caused by a bomb. The loud "Booms" can also be a cause by a leaking gas line that was triggered off by intense heat from thermite. 

In fact there was fire still going on for three months at the destroyed World Trade Center plaza, that it did not extinguish until mid-December 2001.

Try lighting a match near your butt when digestive gas expels from your anus.  It's pretty much physics.  

Let's see.....A plane made out of aluminum parts that is hauling ass-full speed- crashing into a reinforced skyscraper causing beyond extensive damge that the tower fell down?

Yeah. Whatever effects the steel frames also affects the surrounding structure.

The following is a borrowed excerpt from an article published in 2006, titled 'OKC & WTC-7 - The Case For Controlled Demolitions By Douglas Herman': [1]

(excerpt):

"NIST acknowledged no fires within WTC-7 prior to 12 noon on September 11, 2001. If the Twin Towers had already collapsed over an hour earlier, how did these numerous fires start? Flaming aluminum debris and steel beams ejected 400 feet inside the WTC-7? Or arson fires set by a secret team?

 

According to NIST:  "From 11:30 am to 2:30 pm: no diesel smells reported from the exterior, stairwells or lobby areas. No signs of fire or smoke were reported below the 6th Floor from the exterior, stairwells or lobby areas. In the east stairwell, smoke was observed around Floors 19 or 20, and signs of a fully involved fire on the south side of Floor 23 were heard--seen---smelled from Floor 22. Interviews place a fire on Floor 7 at the west wall, toward the south side, at approximately 12:15 p.m."

 

So HOW exactly did all those other fires suddenly ignite? If the Twin Towers had already collapsed more than 90 minutes before, how did ejected aluminum debris and steel beams cause several spontaneous fires? And if ejected material did not cause the fires, what did? "There is no visible debris on the roof," NIST stated. So how did so many fires start inside the building---and why didn't an equal number of fires start inside the Verizon or Post Office building?

 

Soon the fires inside WTC-7 spread in a most haphazard fashion. Almost as if a pyromaniac, or a team of well-trained arsonists, raced from floor to floor. Fires were reported on floors 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Floors 19, 21, 22 and 29 also reported fires. Who knew the contents of WTC-7 were so combustable. Curious indeed that the Secret Service occupied floors 9 and 10, while the SEC occupied 11 and 12. Curious indeed.

 

Collapses Followed A Predictable Pattern

 

Damage to the south face of the trapezoid shape WTC-7 varied from considerable to cosmetic. NIST noted, according to eyewitnesses, only two exterior support columns compromised. However, Deputy Chief Peter Hayden observed: "We were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse." Understandable reasoning, since Hayden had just witnessed two other WTC buildings collapse. "You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o'clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o'clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse."

 

What caused that "visible bulge?" A roomful of burning computers? A floor full of burning SEC records? Recall that the lower floors were not reported ablaze, where a utility substation was located.

 

Yet if all New York steel skyscrapers now predictably collapse from fires why don't other steel skyscraper around the world also collapse, especially after burning hotter and longer? Do the Spanish build better skyscrapers? Indeed they must, if that skyscraper in Madrid (photograph) that burned forever is any example of their structural superiority. Even more significant, why didn't WTC 7---if indeed structurally damaged along its south face--topple into Vesey Street, like a tree toppling sideways chainsawed by a lumberjack?

 

The skyscraper in Madrid never fell.  So how did WTC-7?  How did a building engineered to be extremely strong, because it sat atop an electrical substation, how did a strong building that housed the mayors emergency command post, collapse into its own footprint after several room fires and some frontal damage?

 

Unfortunately, for the plotters who placed those charges, WTC-7 fell perfectly, in a textbook example of controlled demolition. The conspirators performed their work almost too well. 

 

Murrah Building. Oklahoma City

 

Take a look at the Murrah Building (photograph),heavily damaged in the explosion allegedly caused by a truckload of fertilizer. Why didn't it collapse? Far more structurally damaged than WTC-7, the building stood until Controlled Demolition "pulled it." (And yes, the demolition guys do indeed use that term. In the TV Documentary, America Rebuilds, a worker clearly states: "We're getting ready to pull building 6").

 

Murrah may simply have been a practice run for something far more spectacular. The USAF officer who attempted to investigate the debris at Murrah, General Partin, reported that additional demolition charges brought the building down. "This," said General Partin, "is a classic coverup of immense proportions."

 

Exactly.  

 

And, as in the case of the controlled demolitions of the WTC buildings, where the steel was hastily shipped overseas and recycled, the debris pile in Oklahoma City was hastily buried, hastily hidden.

 

"Demolition, especially a very hurried demolition, was  essential though to bury the evidence,"  wrote William Jasper. "General Partin visited the landfill outside Oklahoma City recently where the Murrah Building rubble was taken. He had originally thought that the materials would have been laid out for investigation, as one would expect in a case of this importance, involving such great loss of life and such serious national security implications. Far from it. Although much of the debris was initially deposited on the parking lot and the grounds of the Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department Training Center for examination, it is now buried. The landfill is surrounded by a chain link fence and, when the general visited the site, was guarded by security personnel."

 

Not surprisingly, the same company---Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI) performed clean up chores at both the WTC and Murrah bombsites. And debris that might have indicated clues to a greater conspiracy was hastily removed and destroyed.

 

Likewise, in the first frantic reports from the destruction at the Murrah building, firemen and policemen on the scene reported finding a "second and third explosive device". The reports of additional bombs would become eerily similar to reports of additional bombs going off in the Twin Towers.  Could all of these brave first responders---those in Oklahoma City and now in New York--- be lying? 

 

Predictibly, the controlled, corporate US media quashed any investigation into a possible conspiracy. In effect the media was saying to dead and dying firefighters: Keep your mouths shut.

 

Recently, Major McCormack, the WTC hero who raised the fallen flag on September 11, 2001 was arrested by a SWAT team. A victim of government harassment. Why? McCormack had concluded that around 75% of police, firemen and rescue personnel that he had personally spoken with now believed there was a cover-up pertaining to 9/11 and that many had been threatened that "if they ever open their mouth their pensions are at risk."

 

 

Postscript: One puzzling scientific anomaly. If jet fuel only burns at 600-1000 degrees celsius and steel melts at 1500 degrees, how then were pools of molten steel discovered weeks later, far below the street level of WTC? There is no rational explanation. There is NO scientific explanation. Steel may indeed weaken. But a 600-1000 degree fire can NEVER melt a metal that liquifies at a higher temperature. Just one of the many unexplainable scientific facts that NIST, FEMA and MIT will attempt to explain away."



-Daniel

   

Blasting Caps is likely  the cause of the collapse. I am not exactly a physicist, yet my intuition tells me something is not right; these controlled demolition theories cannot be debunked!

Note: Not included on this entry, is the mention of the F.B.I suspicions of bombs. They had reason to be alarmed that explosives were planted inside the the parking garage. 5 Israelis spies were apprehended in late afternoon of the terrorist attacks at the WTC. The spies were employed at a rental company in New Jersey. The employer owned several moving vans, one which was found to have explosives when East Rutherford police searched the van. During their investigation, the F.B.I. searched the garage of the rental company and discovered explosives that they suspected was to blow up the Twin Towers. It's owner fled to Israel before federal investigators questioned him. Another van that might of belonged to the same owner had a mural on it's side that had a painting of a airplane diving low into New York City with the words 9/11. This van was found to have also explosives when police searched the vehicle. If there were other vans belonging to the same company, it is safe to assume these vehicles were parked between the columns inside the WTC parking garage then detonated that same morning and early afternoon about the same time witnesses heard what they said were bombs going off. Otherwise, in this video is where alleged detonators were set off on the top floors of the WTC. From this, we also get the idea of a "inside job", or perhaps foreign terrorists working as a whole, planning to blow up the WTC in the preceding months before 9/11/01. It takes skill of planning to get inside these skyscrapers without detection.  What do you think?

 

 

  

Remember that allged gas leak I mentioned on a earlier blog entry? Hear the dispatch calls.